Talk:Leyton (ward)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Text and/or other creative content from 2018 Waltham Forest London Borough Council election was copied or moved into Leyton (ward). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from 2022 Waltham Forest London Borough Council election was copied or moved into Leyton (ward). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Clean up required edit
The majority of the article is a direct quotation from Cllr Grell's website. It requires wikifying and perhaps merging with the Leyton page. Ned de Rotelande 11:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC) (And the title shouldn't have a comma) Ned de Rotelande 11:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedrutland (talk • contribs) Page now renamed and some edits completed but more work needed. Ned de Rotelande 16:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Shameful conduct of the Labour Councillor Grell edit
I find it rather shameful that a Labour candidate should slur her opponent by making the fallacious allegations that gay=paedophile slur against Mr. Smith. This gay bashing, and pandering to false stereotypes has got to stop. Gay and lesbians are part of the community which supports left leaning politics, and would vote labour. You don't deserve to be in politics if you have bad judgement and prejudice on this scale. Daikon 10:33, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Grell controversy edit
Is the section Grell controversy significant to keep in this article or is it old news and BLP1E and we can just remove the section? RJFJR (talk) 22:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think you could argue it's a bit longer than it needs to be, but it appears to be well-sourced and I don't think there's a case for removing it entirely. Trim, perhaps? Morwen (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leyton (ward). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080218153225/http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/mostpopular.var.2046574.mostviewed.leyton_byelection_live_lib_dems_regain_seat_more_reaction.php to http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/mostpopular.var.2046574.mostviewed.leyton_byelection_live_lib_dems_regain_seat_more_reaction.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201172442/http://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/leyton-ward-profile-2.pdf to http://www.walthamforest.gov.uk/leyton-ward-profile-2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)