Untitled

edit

I've begun the rather large task of trying to bridle all the information given in the article into a presentable format, but it appears to be a very rambling summary of Gordon's thought, which I wouldn't be surprised if it was written by Gordon himself or a close friend or student. Anyway, it still needs a lot of work. A.G. Pinkwater 23:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Whether this wikipedia article was written by Gordon or someone close to him, by itself, is not an issue, is it? As long as it respects the principles of neutrality. But I agree that adding a section on criticisms on Gordon's work would be very relevant. In my opinion a even more primary concern in the current version of the article is that it has almost no citations! We can't even check if Gordon indeed said all the things the article claims he said! -- TT, 27 February 2012

I agree. Further references would be a great addition. CCS81 (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewis Gordon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply