Talk:Level 3 Communications/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Comcast dispute

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

The Comcast dispute reads like a PR battle between the two companies, giving undue weight for an article about the company. That section is more than the rest of the entire article. It could be consolidated into about two paragraphs, about right for this article. I wouldn't want to read every year's financial reports in the Finance section either. The two companies have resolved the dispute, it's not encyclopedic to continue the battle in Wikipedia.Cotton2 (talk) 06:29, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. The Finance section could be removed, and the Comcast dispute section is much too long. Ttwaring (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

I've removed the Finance section. Ttwaring (talk) 16:11, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

NPOV rewrite of Comcast dispute. Readers can click on citations for details. Cotton2 (talk) 17:39, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

ambiguous sentence

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"...and a few months later, was accused of tapping connections between Google and Yahoo data centers." At least for me, when I read that, it sounded like the NSA was tapping communications between google and yahoo, while what was actually happenning was that they were tapping communications between various google DCs and communications between various yahoo DCs. I'm not quite sure how to fix that sentence though.

hintss (talk) 06:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)