Talk:Letter to My Daughter/GA1
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 01:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: .
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
None
|
NA
Check for WP:BLP: NA
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: very good Thorough check using Google.
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Not all sources are accessible. Random check on few accessible sources (2,3,18).
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (NFC with valid FUR)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:
Single-sentence paragraphs should be avoided.
- Done, by moving the sentence to the end of the first paragraph and re-wording it a bit to better fit the context.
"WIP" ("Works in Progress") ... [3] (Random check on Source 3: unsuccessful, not in source 3)
- Added more specific ref.
"Angelou delivers with her signature passion and fire" [18] (Random check on Source 18: unsuccessful, not in source 18, actually the citation should be to Source 2 which is by the reviewer Karen Algeo Krizman)
- Done.
"easy to take in during brief moments of quiet" ... [18] (Random check on Source 18: unsuccessful, not in source 18, actually the citation should be to Source 2 which is by the reviewer Karen Algeo Krizman)
- Done.
Can you please confirm for the rest of the content, including the other direct quotations whose sources are inaccessible to me, that their inline citations are correct?
- Re-checked everything, and all refs should be accurate now. Thanks for catching the errors here.
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm glad to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appreciate it. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
- Congrats, Christine! --Another Believer (Talk) 02:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)