This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Latest comment: 7 months ago8 comments3 people in discussion
While this is a very impressive effort, I am concerned that the topic isn't notable; reviewing all of the sources I don't find any that establish notability; see the source assessment table. Gricharduk, do you have any additional sources that might contain significant coverage? BilledMammal (talk) 09:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
So, first of all, thank you very much BilledMammal for assessing the article and for the effort you put into the assessment table below. I have never seen that before and it's really good. To be honest, when I stumbled across the Hood article, I was a bit shocked - no name, birth date, etc. So, I thought I would research him and expand the article. The problem with that approach is that, until you have completed the research, you don't know if the person is going to be notable or not! Furthermore, I do agree with you; he isn't notable at the moment. I was hoping someone might write a book on the Olympic team now they know who he is (and the other members of the team). His amateur wrestling career is probably more notable than the rugby union. Most of the 1900 British rugby union team have stubs. To answer your question, there is a book on Rosslyn Park that does have some details on his rugby career but I can only find a copy in the British Library and I don't live in London unfortunately. I was thinking we could combine all of these stub players bios into the Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics article as very few seem to have done anythng notable other than one game in Paris. Gricharduk (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
To answer your question, there is a book on Rosslyn Park that does have some details on his rugby career but I can only find a copy in the British Library and I don't live in London unfortunately Do you have the name of the book? It's possible someone at WP:Resource requests can help.
It is Hoyer-Millar, Charles Christian (1929). Fifty years of Rosslyn Park. London: Wyman & Sons. OCLC60701784. British Library002493178. It is available from some booksellers on eBay but I am not that keen (obviously) to pay for it. Gricharduk (talk) 04:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've requested the source; hopefully it has coverage. BilledMammal (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for making the request. Gricharduk (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was thinking we could combine all of these stub players bios into the Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics article as very few seem to have done anythng notable other than one game in Paris I agree; that would generally be a good idea. BilledMammal (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Significant (though not independent) coverage of his brother; only a passing mention of him, saying "His younger brother, Leslie Hood, was also a member of the Club (elected 1908) and died in 1932 (A.J. 44· 329)."
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. Only mention of Hood being "No, because Gautier sets off on a lightning sprint and reaches L. Hood 2 metres from the goal."
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. Not significant coverage, with only a passing mention in the recap ("Hood also got a try, which C. Whincup converted") and a mention in a list of players
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. Not significant coverage, with only a few passing mentions in the recap.
School magazine, writing an obituary on one of its former students
?
No significant coverage as it is an obituary of his father and only mentions him in passing ("His four sons were all Peterites, and were all in the School at the same time while in recent years his two grandsons, R. H. and C. Metcalfe were also with us")
Not significant coverage; "Leslie Hood of Lond, who did not appear, on the evidenoe of PO Noakes fined 10s for indecent bathing in the river Wey on afternoon August 21st"
Passing mention only; "The Bott Handicap took place on the 15th and attracted fourteen starters; it was won by Mr Kempton Cannon, who beat his own record in his last course, and thus just managed to defeat Mr L. Hood by 2 sec. on three courses."
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. , No signficant coverage; limited to two short sentence, the second of which he shared with two other players: "For a short period Mancehster were without Leslie Hood, who recieved a nasty cut on the bridge of his nose. The feature of the game, apart from the display of Dr. Bythell, was the splendid form shown by Hood, both before and after his accident, he often pentrating the London defences, and the excellent work of Haig on the Prince's side."
Passing mention only, "The other placings were: Miss Muckelt and Mr. Hood, 2; Miss and Mr. Wood, 3; Miss and Mr. Marshall, 4; Miss Irwin and Mr. Cormack, 5."
Primary source; court reporting on his conviction for dangerous driving with analysis or other components that would make it secondary. Longer than most other sources, but being primary prevents it from contirbuting to notability.
No significant coverage; "Dr. N. L. Hood, of London, and his two brothers, who have been at the Bear for about a fortnight, have climbed about every peak in the immediate region: among others, the Matterhorn, Jungfrau, Moncli, Eiger and Finsteraarhom." - Leslie Hood isn't even mentioned by name, and it's possible it was the other two brothers
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. Not significant coverage; single passing mention in a game recap.
Game recap; considered WP:ROUTINE that doesn't contribute to notability per WP:NSPORTS. Not significant coverage; single passing mention in a game recap.
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
There's an alternative to the general notability guideline, and its called WP:NBASIC: If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability – this may be the clearest case of what NBASIC is for as I've ever seen. The fact that a beautiful article of 70,000 bytes can be written – so good that it honestly looks like something at WP:FAC – shows this passes Wikipedia:Notability (people). I am really confused at why you would try to delete an article like this – just after it was substantially expanded – when you had left it alone as a stub for over a year past from your tagging of its notability! BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
"Substantial" is a higher bar than "significant" - you still need significant coverage to meet NBASIC, and we don't have that here.
I am really confused at why you would try to delete an article like this – just after it was substantially expanded – when you had left it alone as a stub for over a year past from your tagging of its notability! Because it is hollow, and cannot not be hollow due to the lack of significant coverage. While it is an impressive effort, it is a series of statements of fact, joined together by off topic discussions of other people and events; it's suitable for a genealogy book, but not for a Wikipedia article. BilledMammal (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Significant coverage of Landau, No mention of Leslie Hood