This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7954681.stm Provides summaries, and links to, reviews from major UK news publications. Seems the film is being panned by, almost, all critics. Choice quotes include "profoundly awful", "pretty woeful and unimaginably boring", "(b)adly written and hastily executed", "consistently abominable", "tragically feeble", and "an appalling waste of a perfectly decent title". I'll maybe add a Reception section to the article sometime in the near future, unless someone beats me to it. Malbolge (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:11, 20 March 2009 (UTC).Reply
It seems to have been added now. Could you add the above link as a reference in the article please, I'm not entirely sure how to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kampin bunny (talk • contribs) 20:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Actually set in Wales?
The dart they threw at the map didn't seem to land in Wales, is the film meant to be set there? If I remember rightly it looked more like somewhere in Suffolk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.143.241.243 (talk) 01:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As part of the 12 days of xmas thing, this is going out free to download for itunes users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.163.55 (talk) 09:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Someone's having a laugh with that one claiming it raked in £152,243,257 when according to imdb pro it only took £1,581,373 up till April 2008 in the UK. (verifying that on this page without an imdb pro subscription will be difficult.) the-numbers.com is claiming the film did zero business in the USA and Box Office Mojo similarly has no info at all. Can someone else verify this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.213.138.250 (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
