Talk:Leptotes plinius

LepIndex

LepIndexing done. Scientific name Tarucus plinius is valid. See :-

• Result for Leptotus. Leptotus is valid but not for plinius species.
• Result for Syntarucus. Syntarucus is a junior homonym for Leptotus.
• Results for plinius. As per LepIndexing on plinius the valid genus name appears to be Tarucus !

Edits

I think the variety of butterfly pictures and its informative captions increases the quality of the page dramatically. I do think the page would benefit from a "Distribution" category because the "Description" section simply lists off locations strung together with semi-colons. It makes it slightly hard to read, but putting it in bullet-point form would be an easy edit. For clarity, the three sections in "Life history" may be better off split into two main groups: "Diet", containing the Food Plants subsection, and "Life Cycle", containing the Larva and Pupa subcategories. Catejiang (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leptotes plinius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930180830/http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~EY4Y-TKNM/philframe.html to http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~EY4Y-TKNM/philframe.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 14 May 2017 (UTC)