Talk:Leptasterias pusilla

Comment

I have added basic content and citations. However, this article is still extremely inadequate/incomplete. I will continue to work on it in the coming days. Kilbad 03:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Review

Hi Kilbad, you requested someone take a look at WT:WikiProject Marine life. I like the referencing of your statements and the wikilinking is going well. A couple of things to start off with:

• For the taxonomy and picture, try using a taxobox - Wikipedia:Taxobox_usage. Take a look at Starfish for a guide, you might find it a good idea to copy that one and modify it.
• For the description, try putting it in your own words and then using the reference at the end. This is the same for most of the statements. Generally quotations are only used when it is important that you know exactly what was said by whom.
• Put a little more info at the top of the page so that it summarises the article.

Hope that helped a bit. It looks good and will make a good article. When you feel ready, find some other pages that can link to it, then more people will see it. |→ Spaully^₪† 18:33, 11 April 2007 (GMT)

Found a similar article you could use for inspiration or nick the taxobox from - Linckia laevigata. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Spaully (talk • contribs) 18:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

HI Kilbad, i think you should remove the statement indicating that L. pusilla is able to feed while brooding, since that was an observation done in another species Anasterias rupicola from the Southern Hemisphere. Thanks, Dagagi (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

• Done. ---kilbad (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Leptasterias pusilla close-up.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Leptasterias pusilla close-up.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leptasterias pusilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717141132/http://gondolin.ucsd.edu/cgi-bin/pview.exe?CISOROOT=%2Fceo-sioa&CISOPTR=11537&CISORESTMP=%2Fqbuild%2Ftemplate1.html&CISOVIEWTMP=%2Fqbuild%2Ftemplate2.html to http://gondolin.ucsd.edu/cgi-bin/pview.exe?CISOROOT=%2Fceo-sioa&CISOPTR=11537&CISORESTMP=%2Fqbuild%2Ftemplate1.html&CISOVIEWTMP=%2Fqbuild%2Ftemplate2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)