Talk:Leopold I of Belgium/Archives/2019/May
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Celia Homeford in topic Family Tree
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Family Tree
The Box above the family tree claiming that the section is excessively intricate is ridiculous. Whoever put that in the article needs to remove it. A 5 generation pedigree for a king is not only appropriate but necessary to fully understand the historic family relationships between various royal houses. I would say not only is it not excessively intricate but is not nearly intricate enough. But at the very least 5 full generations is pretty much standard for any royal pedigree. Seems to me the person who posted that box just doesn't like genealogy and should probably skip reading articles about royals if it annoys them that much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.190.183.221 (talk • contribs)
- The family relationships between the royal houses can be fully understood from a 4-generation pedigree. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)