Talk:Leopard attack
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leopard attack article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contents of the Leopard of Panar page were merged into Leopard attack on November 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | A fact from Leopard attack appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Summary of attack list
editThe list of leopard attacks is very good, but it needs a summary total as per WP:CALC as a courtesy to the reader that wants to know how many are listed, total. Just as the lead of the has summaries at the top for those who just want the gist at a glance, the list total provides the reader with a summary of the list at the bottom. It is clear, in context what the total is: just the list at a glance, as of we have it at last edit, with no analysis or interpretation. Please allow it to stand, as it is classic WP:CALC from What Original Research is Not. Chrisrus (talk) 06:22, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. Stop with your pointy nonsense. It's time for you to drop the stick. There is an overwhelming consensus against this sort of thing that you refuse to accept. You know this and yet you still persist. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 11:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, this place may only be rightly used to discuss article improvement. Please explain, as I have, how your recent edit improves the article. I will wait an appropriate amount of time and then put it back the way it was. Chrisrus (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- It improves the article by removing WP:OR. Again, this is per the overwhelming consensus on the matter. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 16:26, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, this place may only be rightly used to discuss article improvement. Please explain, as I have, how your recent edit improves the article. I will wait an appropriate amount of time and then put it back the way it was. Chrisrus (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Verifiable and inaccurate?
editI have no doubt that leopards kill humans and that because these are reported, they are verifiable. It may also be that it can be verified that a single leopard has been reported to kill hundreds of humans (e.g by newspaper reports) - but how can this possibly be accurate! Unless there is a way of identifying an individual leopard and a robust eye-witness report of each killing, how can this be substantiated?__DrChrissy (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Many Wikipedians don't agree, but under certain conditions we can't just pass something on from the sources to the articles if it really doesn't make sence that they would be able to know that for sure. However, one must be very careful about this. Are we sure it's so strange for them to claim only one cat killed all those people? Do we know enough to doubt their ability to know this? Chrisrus (talk) 19:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
The "Recent attacks" section
editThe "Recent attacks" section needs to be looked at. Firstly, the word "Recent" means it is time-stamped which we would not accept in the text body. Secondly, it now looks like it contravenes Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a newspaper. I have not deleted or edited this section, but I urge other editors to consider this.__DrChrissy (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- It might help if we had a look at the other articles in this category and see how they deal with it and compare. I'm sure this can be brought in line with standard Wikipedian practice about collecting such attacks. Chrisrus (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- List of fatal shark attacks in Australia might be one way forward.__DrChrissy (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a good one. How would you like to do this article, in terms of the most recent attacks? Chrisrus (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- It is possible to make columns sortable so this could be year, location, number killed, etc. I have pasted an example below which I created for Pregnancy in fish. __DrChrissy (talk) 22:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a good one. How would you like to do this article, in terms of the most recent attacks? Chrisrus (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- List of fatal shark attacks in Australia might be one way forward.__DrChrissy (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
| Species | Reproduction
method |
Gestation period
(Days) |
Number of young
(Average) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlantic sharpnose shark[1] | (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae) | Viviparous | 300-330 | 4-6 |
| Barbeled houndshark[2] | (Leptocharias smithii) | Viviparousa | >120 | 7 |
| Blackspot shark[3] | (Carcharhinus sealei) | Viviparousb | 270 | 1-2 |
| Blue shark[4] | (Prionace glauca) | Viviparous | 270-366 | 4-135 |
| Bonnethead shark | (Sphyrna tiburo) | Viviparousc | 4-12[5] | |
| Bull shark[6] | (Carcharhinus leucas) | Viviparous | 366 | 4-10 |
| Butterfly goodeid[7] | (Ameca splendens) | Viviparous | 55-60 | 6-30 |
| Caribbean sharpnose shark | (Rhizoprionodon porosus) | Viviparous | 2-6[8] | |
| Daggernose shark[9] | (Isogomphodon oxyrhynchus) | Viviparous | 366 | 2-8 |
| Lemon shark[10] | (Negaprion brevirostris) | Viviparous | 366 | 18 (max) |
| Oceanic whitetip shark[11] | (Carcharhinus longimanus) | Viviparous | 366 | 1-15 |
| Dwarf seahorse[12] | (Hippocampus zosterae) | Viviparous | 3-55 | 10 |
| Sandbar shark[13] | (Carcharhinus plumbeus) | Viviparous | 366 | 8 |
| Spadenose shark[9] | (Scoliodon laticaudus) | Viviparousd | 150-180 | 6-18 |
| Viviparous eelpout[14] | (Zoarces viviparus) | Viviparouse | 180 | 30-400 |
| Basking shark[15] | (Cetorhinus maximus) | Ovoviviparous | >366 | unknownf |
| Bat ray[16] | (Myliobatis californica) | Ovoviviparous | 270-366 | 2-10 |
| Coelocanth | (g. Latimeria) | Ovoviviparous | >366[17] | |
| Blue stingray | (Dasyatis chrysonota) | Ovoviviparous | 270 | 1-5 |
| Bluespotted stingray[18] | (Neotrygon kuhlii) | Ovoviviparous | 90-150 | 1-7 |
| Carpet sharks | (f. Ginglymostomatidae) | Ovoviviparous | 180 | 30-40 |
| Knifetooth sawfish[19] | (Anoxypristis cuspidata) | Ovoviviparous | 150 | 6-23 |
| Nurse shark | (Ginglymostoma cirratum), | Ovoviviparous | 150 | 21-29 |
| Sailfin molly | (Poecilia latipinna) | Ovoviviparous | 21-28 | 10-140 |
| Salmon shark[4] | (Lamna ditropis) | Ovoviviparous | 270 | 2-6 |
| Sand tiger shark[20] | (Carcharias taurus) | Ovoviviparous | 270-366 | 2g |
| School shark[21] | (Galeorhinus galeus) | Ovoviviparous | 366 | 28-38 |
| Shortfin mako shark[22] | (Isurus oxyrinchus) | Ovoviviparous | 450-540 | 4-18 |
| Spotted eagle ray[11] | (Aetobatus narinari) | Ovoviviparous | 366 | 4 |
| Tiger shark[19] | (Galeocerdo cuvier) | Ovoviviparous | 480 | 10-80 |
| Tawny nurse shark[23] | (Nebrius ferrugineus) | Aplacental viviparity | 1-2 |
- a Unlike any other shark, the yolk-sac placenta is globular or spherical.[23]
- b At first, the embryos are sustained by a yolk sac, but later a placenta develops.
- c A bonnethead female produced a pup by parthenogenesis in 2001.[24]
- d The spadenose shark has the most advanced form of placental viviparity known in fish, as measured by the complexity of the placental connection and the difference in weight between the egg and the newborn young.[25]
- e The eelpout suckles its young embryos while still within their mother's body, making it the only fish species to suckle its offspring.[14]
- f Only one pregnant female is known to have been caught; she was carrying six unborn young.[15]
- g 1 per uterine horn
- That's good work. I say go ahead, but I'd like to ask others what they think it should look like because the list of leopard attacks used to be much longer. It got so long that it was summarized into the small list you'll find in the article today. Yet this has left a problem how to deal with new attacks, because new attacks are individual items, but the new list is a summary of many individual items. So let's get a little a little advice. I'll ask Mario what he thinks should be done with recent attacks. Chrisrus (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
The date should be full date (day, month, year), and don't remove the recent attack section here until the article list of leopard attacks is made, other columns could be type of injury inflicted on the human, and the condition of the attacker leopard after the attack (killed, captured, fled, etc). Editor abcdef (talk) 05:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Please don't expect me to be making these edits. I have my own personal reasons for not doing this. I am simply offering a potential solution to a problem which hopefully improves the article as reference material.__DrChrissy (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Atlantic Sharpnose Shark". Florida Museum of Natural History. Retrieved October 16, 2014.
- ^ Compagno, L.J.V., M. Dando and Fowler, S. (2005). Sharks of the World. Princeton University Press. pp. 260–261. ISBN 978-0-691-12072-0.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Van Der Elst, R. (1993). A Guide to the Common Sea Fishes of Southern Africa. Struik. p. 367. ISBN 9781868253944.
- ^ a b Compagno, L.J.V. (1984). Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known To Date. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Cite error: The named reference "FAO" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "Sphyrna tiburo". Fishbase.org. Retrieved October 16, 2014.
- ^ McAuley, R.B., Simpfendorfer, C.A., Hyndes, G.A. and Lenanton, R.C.J. (2007). "Distribution and reproductive biology of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo), in Western Australian waters". Mar. Freshwater Res. 58 (1): 116–126. doi:10.1071/MF05234.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Butterfly goodeid". Toronto zoo. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
- ^ "Rhizoprionodon porosus". Fishbase.com. Retrieved October 16, 2014.
- ^ a b Fowler, S.L., R.D. Cavanagh, M. Camhi, G.H. Burgess, G.M. Cailliet, S.V. Fordham, C.A. Simpfendorfer, and J.A. Musick (2005). Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. ISBN 2-8317-0700-5.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) Cite error: The named reference "fowler et al" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ Feldheim, K. A.; Gruber, S. H.; Ashley, M. V. (22 August 2002). "The breeding biology of lemon sharks at a tropical nursery lagoon". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 269 (1501): 1655–1661. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2051.
- ^ a b Rigby, C.L.; Barreto, R.; Carlson, J.; Fernando, D.; Fordham, S.; Francis, M.P.; Herman, K.; Jabado, R.W.; Liu, K.M.; Marshall, A.; Pacoureau, N.; Romanov, E.; Sherley, R.B.; Winker, H. (2019). "Carcharhinus longimanus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019: e.T39374A2911619. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T39374A2911619.en. Retrieved 27 October 2020. Cite error: The named reference "IUCN" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "Little seahorse". Animal Diversity web. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
- ^ Baremore, I.E. and Hale, L.F. (2012). "Reproduction of the sandbar shark in the Western North Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico". Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science. 4. American Fisheries Society: 560–572. doi:10.1080/19425120.2012.700904.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Matt Walker (September 28, 2010). "Pregnant European eelpout fish suckles young embryos". BBC News. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
- ^ a b The Shark Trust. "Basking Shark Factsheet". The Shark Trust. Retrieved 2006-07-07.
- ^ "Bat ray". Monterey Bay Aquarium Online Field Guide. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
- ^ Lavett Smith, C.; Rand, Charles S.; Schaeffer, Bobb; Atz, James W. (1975). "Latimeria, the living coelacanth, is ovoviviparous". Science. 190 (4219): 1105–6. Bibcode:1975Sci...190.1105L. doi:10.1126/science.190.4219.1105.
- ^ Pierce, S. J.; Pardo, S. A.; Bennett, M. B. (2009). "Reproduction of the blue-spotted maskray Neotrygon kuhlii (Myliobatoidei: Dasyatidae) in south-east Queensland, Australia". Journal of Fish Biology. 74 (6): 1291–308. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02202.x. PMID 20735632.
- ^ a b "Knifetooth sawfish". Ichthyology. Florida Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 2013-09-24. Cite error: The named reference "flmnh" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Bansemer, C.S. and Bennett, M.B. (2009). "Reproductive periodicity, localised movements and behavioural segregation of pregnant Carcharias taurus at Wolf Rock, southeast Queensland, Australia". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 374: 215. doi:10.3354/meps07741.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "Fish Bulletin No. 64. The Biology of the Soupfin Galeorhinus zyopterus and Biochemical Studies of the Liver". Repositories.cdlib.org. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
- ^ Last, P.R. and Stevens, J.D. (2012). Sharks and Rays of Australia — Second Edition. Australia: CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation). ISBN 978-0-643-09457-4.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Compagno, L.J.V. (2002). Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date (Volume 2). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 195–199. ISBN 92-5-104543-7. Cite error: The named reference "compagno" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ "Captive shark had 'virgin birth'". BBC.
- ^ Wourms, J.P. (1993). "Maximization of evolutionary trends for placental viviparity in the spadenose shark, Scoliodon laticaudus". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 38: 269–294. doi:10.1007/BF00842922.
Merger Discussion
editRequest received to merge articles: Leopard of the Yellagiri Hills into Leopard attack; dated November 2015. Discuss here. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Rationale: Merge three articles on man-eater animals. All three articles rely on a single source - a book by the hunter Kenneth Anderson who killed the animals himself. These have no dates and have possible WP:Copyvio problems. - Kenfyre (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
References
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Leopard attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailypioneer.com/315623/Losers-on-both-sides-as-man-animal-war-rages.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gujaratforest.org/man-con.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://lynx.uio.no/catfolk/cnissues/cn09-11.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://lynx.uio.no/catfolk/cnissues/cn06-05.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://lynx.uio.no/catfolk/cnissues/cn11-04.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Citation 77 does not work
editThe website does work, but the article seems to be missing. 119.152.144.158 (talk) 10:12, 23 July 2022 (UTC)