Talk:Leo Koch

Untitled

A quick google search reveals these promising links for whomever wants to incorporate the information:

[1] [2] [3] [4]

-- Limulus (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

A challenge from Roger Ebert cannot go unanswered, can it? =) Powers ^T 22:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leo Koch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100116153852/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/making_out_is_its_own_reward.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/making_out_is_its_own_reward.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Disputed title

This article doesn't belong in Wikipedia, at least under the current title. This is a very clear case of WP:BIO1E, as Koch would not have an article, but for having been fired for his outspokenness on sexual mores, and there is no other significant media coverage about him. Per the guideline, the title should be changed to reflect the notable event—his firing. Perhaps, the Firing of Leo Koch.

However imho, even an article under that title does not rise to the level of notability. That's a separate discussion that could be had, and might lead to the article's being deleted, or perhaps the content could be merged as a brief mention in an article about academic standards, or as a "before" example of the cultural and academic standards prior to the sexual and cultural revolution of the 1960s, in an article about the latter. Mathglot (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)