Talk:Lemn Sissay

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Fob.schools in topic Edit war and WP:BLP

When was he born? edit

When was he born? 78.151.89.146 (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Adoption/Race edit

Sissay had a recent and quite controversial comment piece in the Guardian on adoption and race (link). It provoked a response in Katharine Birbalsingh's Telegraph blog (link). Randomnonsense talk 02:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lemn Sissay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lemn Sissay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemn Sissay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit war and WP:BLP edit

There seems to be an edit war underway at present, probably precipitated by this tweet by the article subject today, objecting to certain content. As it stands, the content is sourced as far as I can see, but it may fall foul of WP:BLP and/or WP:UNDUE. I think it may be time for page protection while we sort out what to do. Fob.schools (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Indeed. I have requested page protection at RFPP. aboideautalk 19:26, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Fob.schools, It seems like a reasonable request for privacy reasons. I would be ok with removing it. The subject is requesting removal of personal details including clinical diagnoses. Per WP:BLPPUBLIC, this seems fair. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 20:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm not saying that I disagree, Broccoli & Coffee, but I'm curious as to how you got that out of BLPPUBLIC, given that it says "If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it."? aboideautalk 21:18, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Aboideau - Meant to link WP:BLPKIND instead, but regardless, I'm looking specifically at the subject's request of having a medical diagnoses removed. This isn't specifically mentioned on WP:BLP, but I'm applying a general "presumption in favor of privacy", along with Editors should make every effort to act with kindness toward the subjects of biographical material when the subjects arrive to express concern. I'm not suggesting removing information about the play, just one line as in this edit. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 21:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. I agree, that revision is probably ideal. aboideautalk 21:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have to say I am uneasy about removing all mention of this performance, especially given that it is referenced to the Guardian. I think its quite possible to edit the text to remove anything about mental health issues, while maintaining a reference to the show. It was obviously quite seminal to his recovery and later works. I think it is quite precedent-setting to remove it entirely on request. Fob.schools (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply