Talk:Leigh Genesis F.C.

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Ownership of Hilton Park

edit

There is some debate as to whether Leigh Centurions are the landlords or the tennants at Hilton Park, I can confirm that they are the tennants. The following link supports this assertion: [1] Underneath the heading "Hilton Park" there is the following passage "Grundy Hill Estates is a company which was formed to purchase Hilton Park for (Leigh) RMI and to 'look after' the interests of (Leigh) RMI..."

Well in that case the Centurions are tennents of Grundy Hill Estates, not RMI. I'll ammend. Grinner 13:04, 25 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Strictly speaking, yes. Grundy Hill Estates was set up after the sale of Horwich R.M.I.'s old ground, Grundy Hill, to look out for the Club, so most people wouldn't deny a close link. I also remember there being members of the Leigh board on the board of Grundy Hill Estates. But strictly speaking you are right. Your rewording seems fair enough to me :-).

Cheers. Grinner 16:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Longest name

edit

The article claims that RMI have the longest name in English football, but there is a club in the Northern League called Sunderland Ryhope Community Association Football Club, which I make to be 6 letters longer...... ChrisTheDude 09:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Beaconsfield Slough Youth Club Old Boys Football Club is also longer, as is Jarrow Roofing Boldon Community Association Football Club..... ChrisTheDude 09:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
And Hamble Aerostructures Sports & Social Club Football Club is even longer.... ChrisTheDude 09:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
But would Hamble ASSC have the suffix F.C. anyway? I know down here in Devon, Totnes & Dartington SC dont use the F.C. (Sports Club Football Club sounds just daft anyway), but the Devon F.A. software can't handle it properly as it always sticks F.C. after club names. - fchd 16:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Fair point, that one can be knocked off the list of names that are longer than Leigh RMI's. I stand by the others, though :-) ChrisTheDude 06:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Best league finish

edit

"Best League Finish: Northern Premier League Champions, 1999-2000" - surely every finish since then has been better given that they've been at a higher level.....? Specifically their best finish would be 5th in the Conference National in 2000–01 ChrisTheDude 13:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

That wording was taken directly from the official RMI website, which is cited at the end of the relevant section of the article. I can see how it's unclear, but I believe that it means highest league finish for the league the club was in at the time. So finishing 5th in Conference National would be a higher finish in the football league pyramid, but is lower within the league in which the club was playing that year. I'd be amenable to a change in wording to clarify, however. Friejose 14:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Horwich-Spennymoor Program 94.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Horwich-Spennymoor Program 94.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:04, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Leigh Genesis F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Leigh Genesis F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply