Talk:Legislative consent motion
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED by proposer [1] per lack of objections. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Proposal for move
editPorposed move to: Legislative Consent Motion
Seeing as the official name is now "Legislative Consent Motion" shouldn't the article be changed with "Sewel motion" becoming a re-direct? Davidkinnen 20:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Survery
editSupport
edit- Propose and Support - the official name has changed so should the page
Oppose
editDiscussion
edit- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Wales
editFollowing the referendum passing in 2011, Wales also has legislative powers, including the system of legislative consent motions. -Rrius (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legislative Consent Motion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903083911/http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/legConMem/index.htm to http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/legConMem/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Update needed
editRetained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill Kaihsu (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
New refused LCM
editThe constitution secutary Angus Robertson says it will have been breached ten times when the rules bill gets royal assent. Does someone want to add that to the list either now or after royal assent? GothicGolem29 (talk) 23:33, 29 June 2023 (UTC)