Talk:Legality of child pornography
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Legality of child pornography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct) | |||
| ||||
 | NOTE:
|
| Per the Wikipedia:Child protection policy, editors who attempt to use Wikipedia to pursue or facilitate inappropriate adult–child relationships, who advocate inappropriate adult–child relationships, or who identify themselves as paedophiles, will be indefinitely blocked. |
 | Text and/or other creative content from Child pornography was copied or moved into Legality of child pornography with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Protected edit request on 11 February 2023
editIn the status of Cyprus, change "Fictional" status to "Illegal" as possession of fictional pornography is illegal.
Alegal
editIn Argentina, fictional child pornography is really alegal, you can still draw it. 2800:2145:B400:79:8D54:7F35:380C:99B6 (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Debate neutrality
editI'm tagging the debate section as it does not seem to represent the debate but rather further advance the arguments for laws against child pornography. For example every argument for its legality contains a counter argument against it right after it but not the opposite. Further there's no mention of prohibiting virtual child pornography and that it has been debated even by academics in legislatures as being nonsensical. There is no mention of research that possession and usage does not lead to an increase in sexual abuse or that the research pointing to such is either not very substantial and lacking or in some cases non-existent. Laws that allow adolescents to engage in sexual activities but not in pornography and hence also cause issues with sexting have also increasingly been under fire. Biofase flame| stalk 11:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Edit request
editI noticed that the UK Fictional cell says 'Illegal' but the summary says 'pseudo-photograph', which is defined in the law as 'appears to be a photograph'. I think 'Legal; not realistic' would be more accurate here. 2A02:AB88:248D:1C00:A310:3F9C:4C73:E41B (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove flags from "Europe" and "North America" that fails MOS:ICONDECORATION. 83.171.90.83 (talk) 09:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}}template.
Also note that MOS:ICONDECORATION does allow icons for navigation, and this is common practice on similar pages (Legality of incest, Legality of cryptocurrency by country or territory, Legality of cannabis( Jamedeus (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Legalization of fictional child pornography in Taiwan
edit | It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Legality of child pornography. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
In the status of Taiwan, please
1. Change "Fictional" status to "Legal"
2. Change "Possession" status to "Legal; fictional only"
3. In "Short summary" section: Change `The law doesn't explicitly include "simulated images".[150]` to `Fictional child pornography, with the exception of creations depicting real people or realistic images generated by AI, are excluded from the "Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act".[150]`
4. Replace source [150] with "https://join.gov.tw/idea/detail/233df5b7-cbb8-4ffc-b8fb-5279ef84823a"
More details:
The current article mentions that the law is ambiguous, which just changed recently. An executive letter (Official Correspondence No. 1130014287 from the Ministry of Health and Welfare[1]) published on 14th of May, 2024 following a meeting between the legislative, judicial, and general public clarified that the ambiguous portion of the "Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act" did not intend to limit freedom of expression but rather protect real children, thus the document interprets and limits the law from affecting fictional art (with the exceptions mentioned above). Also, source [150] is a dead link, though it is no longer needed after this change is applied. The same set of changes has been applied to the Chinese version of this page. Froxcey (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2024 (UTC)