Talk:Legal status of the State of Palestine

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Selfstudier in topic To the point: sovereign?

Merge

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Both Political status of the Palestinian territories and Legal status of the State of Palestine seem to touch exactly the same issue of Palestinian legal and political status. Though this article is only 1 year old, it is much more detailed, thus i propose this to be the target.GreyShark (dibra) 11:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Previous request to move that you initiated was rejected. Palestinian territories and State of Palestine are still two different things, what is the reason you are requesting essentially the same move again ? WarKosign 11:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Correct, but after almost two years many things changed and recently most Palestinian territories articles are being renamed into SOP articles. This case is clearly a redundant duplicity.GreyShark (dibra) 19:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
I agree with merge idea, political, self determination, sovereignty issues surrounding SoP might as well all be in one place and clearly there is better material here.Selfstudier (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The issues surrounding SoP are already all in one place, Legal status of the State of Palestine. WarKosign 20:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
Seems like a distinction without a difference lol. On the actual Palestinian territories (which in fact should be just one territory according to Israel, the US and the UN) there is a ...don't mix this up with....at the top so I guess could do the same thing with the Political Status for...page, save confusing people any more than they are confused already.Selfstudier (talk) 09:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Legal status of the State of Palestine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality?

edit

Can we take this tag off now? I can't see anything that warrants keeping it on, that's just me tho :)Selfstudier (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Legal status of the State of Palestine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

To the point: sovereign?

edit

Sovereignty is the essential point.

Does the UN recognise it as sovereign?

Who does, who does not?

The rest is useless diplospeak. The whole article is an exercise in public diplomacy, not an effort to give encyclopedia-style concise information. Arminden (talk) 08:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

See State recognition and dynamic sovereignty for why the matter is not a straightforward binary as stated in the above source free opinion.
That apart, Palestine has the right to statehood (right to self determination per UN resolutions, now confirmed by ICJ statement of the applicable law), is recognized as a state by two thirds of UN member states and seated as an observer state at the UN itself. Selfstudier (talk) 09:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply