Talk:Legal Aid Ontario/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Nikkimaria in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA status. My review should be posted within the next few days. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately I feel this article is not yet at GA standard. Feel free to renominate once the below issues have been addressed. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Writing and formatting

edit
  • "About the organization" is not an appropriate section heading - the article as a whole is about the organization
  • Use "1950s", etc instead of "50s" in section headings
  • A number of sections are overly listy, and should be written in prose
  • Lead does not adequately summarize the article, and is rather unencyclopedic in tone (particularly the second sentence)
  • Per WP:LAYOUT, External links should come after references, and should not duplicate cited sources. Also, Footnotes subheading is unnecessary, as it is the only subheading under References
  • See also should not include links that are or should be linked in article text

Accuracy and verifiability

edit
  • Footnotes should appear after punctuation
  • Some sections are completely unreferenced
  • Use a consistent reference format
  • Need more third-party sources - over-reliance on the organization's website
  • "modeled on similar doctrines in England and Scotland" - the ref describes the doctrines of England, but does not support the assertion that Ontario's doctrines are based on those
  • Avoid original research and synthesis

Broad

edit
  • "Aboriginal legal rights" section does not seem to be connected to the article topic
  • "About the organization" should be recast and expanded

Neutrality

edit
  • Please see WP:W2W, and avoid inserting editorial bias
  • Maintain an encyclopedic tone at all times
  • Avoid promotional language

Stability

edit

No issues noted

Images

edit
  • Per the licensing tag on the logo's page, "You must also include the source of the work, all available copyright information" - this is not done