Talk:Legal Aid Ontario/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Nikkimaria in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA status. My review should be posted within the next few days. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I feel this article is not yet at GA standard. Feel free to renominate once the below issues have been addressed. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Writing and formatting
edit- "About the organization" is not an appropriate section heading - the article as a whole is about the organization
- Use "1950s", etc instead of "50s" in section headings
- A number of sections are overly listy, and should be written in prose
- Lead does not adequately summarize the article, and is rather unencyclopedic in tone (particularly the second sentence)
- Per WP:LAYOUT, External links should come after references, and should not duplicate cited sources. Also, Footnotes subheading is unnecessary, as it is the only subheading under References
- See also should not include links that are or should be linked in article text
Accuracy and verifiability
edit- Footnotes should appear after punctuation
- Some sections are completely unreferenced
- Use a consistent reference format
- Need more third-party sources - over-reliance on the organization's website
- "modeled on similar doctrines in England and Scotland" - the ref describes the doctrines of England, but does not support the assertion that Ontario's doctrines are based on those
- Avoid original research and synthesis
Broad
edit"Aboriginal legal rights" section does not seem to be connected to the article topic- "About the organization" should be recast and expanded
Neutrality
edit- Please see WP:W2W, and avoid inserting editorial bias
- Maintain an encyclopedic tone at all times
- Avoid promotional language
Stability
editNo issues noted
Images
edit- Per the licensing tag on the logo's page, "You must also include the source of the work, all available copyright information" - this is not done