Talk:Left Behind (2014 film)

Is criticism of its Christian agenda, or legitimate criticism?

I'd like to know 134.148.10.13 (talk) 22:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, if the criticism says "This is a horrible film with a bad plot and bad acting" or something to that effect, then it's criticism of the film. If the criticism says "Yet another crappy evangelical film that will convince no-one to convert but doesn't seem to realize this" or something to that effect, then it's criticism of an evangelical agenda. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 14:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Remake or reboot?

I haven't seen it so I don't know, but the article currently says it's a remake, but I've heard it's not. --Musdan77 (talk) 01:34, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't believe it qualifies as a reboot, as it's not discarding established continuity and backstory in favor of new continuity and backstory. For instance, if they re-wrote the events to have a secular, scientific rationale, that would be a reboot. But simply re-adapting the same source material (as this film seems to be doing) is just a remake. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 15:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Remake. The real question is "why?". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.39.86 (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Left Behind (2014 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.leftbehindmovie.com/frequently-asked-questions/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:36, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Left Behind (2014 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131102232618/http://www.leftbehindmovie.com/frequently-asked-questions/ to http://www.leftbehindmovie.com/frequently-asked-questions/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:37, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Reception Section

The partial quote:

"In fact, most Christians ... insistent, crazy, delusional, or at the very least just really annoying." is great. I used the dots to save time. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Left Behind (2014 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130811153400/http://theadvocate.com/home/6588020-125/nicholas-cage-to-shoot-movie to http://theadvocate.com/home/6588020-125/nicholas-cage-to-shoot-movie

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Left Behind now got a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

This isn't a drill guys. Seems like that Left Behind recently lost its 1% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, and this film got a 0%, based on 69 reviews. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/left_behind_2014 --Stephenfisher2001 (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)