Talk:Left-behind children in China
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MagDub22.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aaronqjm.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Left-behind children in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160815222449/http://epaper.bjnews.com.cn/html/2014-04/30/content_509404.htm to http://epaper.bjnews.com.cn/html/2014-04/30/content_509404.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160813071711/http://sztv.cutv.com/news/china/201307/0593570205.shtml to http://sztv.cutv.com/news/china/201307/0593570205.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I would like to edit this page
editI am interested in revising this article. Overall, the current page is a well-thought-out article with neat structure. It discusses the cause, impact, and influences although the subtitles are not always clear. One of the main issues I identified is the lack of reference in the original article. There are many paragraphs without a single citation, which led me to question the article’s POV and integrity. I plan to expand the original text and edit out the texts that are not substantiated.Xli1218 (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
I will start editing this article soon. If you are interested in my work, I save most of them in my sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Xli1218/sandbox). I welcome constructive criticism and suggestions. Please feel free to comment under this page or my user page. Xli1218 (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review of Article
editFirst of all, great job on this article! I learned a lot about a topic that I was unfamiliar with and enjoyed doing so. I love the way you informed me about this issue with disrupting a neutral tone. You effectively summarized your research in a way that was easy to follow and captured my attention. To make this article even better, I suggest that you proofread it and do an in-depth review of grammar and sentence structure. There were quite a few errors in this area that distracted me from the information in the article. If addressed, I believe that this article would be even easier to read and communicate the importance of this topic without hindrance. Again, wonderful work! I loved reviewing this article! Mkhurley19 (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)