Talk:Leesa Streifler
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leesa Streifler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion edit
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (It is being edited to meet standards at the moment.) --Mlscawsand (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Temps edit
The user who put back unreferenced and not verified templates. National Gallery of Canada and Juxtupos magazine can not be called not notable and not verifiable links. From my POV it's the highest level of ignorance to do so. Hence, I'm removing the temps back. I cleaned the article from list of unverified exhibitions. It can't be constituted as non verified resume now. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Highest level of ignorance, hmm. I've removed most of the unsourced and/or non-notable shows, and adopted the preferable prose format, since the bullet point business is very much in the style of a resume. I've voted for 'keep' in the AfD, but also noted several times that an indiscriminate list format isn't acceptable, and is probably what led one editor to see the article as an advert. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- Dates of the shows aren't necessary, nor is the inclusion of those who curated the shows, unless they happen to meet our notability guidelines. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leesa Streifler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309225134/http://www.estevanartgallery.com/slide-show/slide-show/leesa-streifler-embodied.html to http://www.estevanartgallery.com/slide-show/slide-show/leesa-streifler-embodied.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)