Talk:Lee Seung-bok
Latest comment: 11 months ago by 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 in topic Cleanup needed
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lee Seung-bok article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cleanup needed
editGrammar in this article is currently a bit of a mess, and it needs more citations.
Make sure to use consistent date formats; most Korea-related articles use DDMMYYYY so let's use that here too. toobigtokale (talk) 10:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- A few minor comments, page is hardly a "bit of a mess" as you claim. One citation is needed. You don't get to unilaterally decide to downgrade it Mztourist (talk) 03:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- i still think it's kind of a mess, grammar is still mostly off and is underdeveloped given that there's two axes of controversies
- if you think c is fine then im not gonna debate it. genuine question: who does get to decide to downgrade it? i only did because the page is relatively minor and assumed it wouldn't be controversial toobigtokale (talk) 04:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Explain exactly how "it's kind of a mess, grammar is still mostly off and is underdeveloped given that there's two axes of controversies". Mztourist (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Not really interested in debates on Wiki, in fact you win I concede. Mostly just interested in the other question. toobigtokale (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Asking for clarification of vague and ambiguous accusations like "this article is a mess" leveled against the article author (User:Mztourist) is hardly a debate. 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not really interested in debates on Wiki, in fact you win I concede. Mostly just interested in the other question. toobigtokale (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Explain exactly how "it's kind of a mess, grammar is still mostly off and is underdeveloped given that there's two axes of controversies". Mztourist (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)