Talk:Lech Wałęsa/Archives/2019/June
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pebbleroad in topic Should we list Kaczorowski as a disputed predecessor?
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Should we list Kaczorowski as a disputed predecessor?
Obviously, neither Kaczorowski or anyone from the Polish government in exile held political power, but Walesa did choose to legally succeed from him instead of Jaruzelski, so I added him in as a predecessor and differentiated it as de jure/ de facto. If anyone can think of a more accurate way to encapsulate that differentiation, that would obviously be preferable, but in the status quo it feels weird to list as sole predecessor a man Walesa clearly didn't consider to be his predecessor. Pebbleroad (talk) 05:53, 20 June 2019 (UTC)pebbleroad, 20 June 2019