![]() | Leander Schnerr has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 17, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Leander Schnerr appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- ... that Leander Schnerr (pictured) survived the Great Chicago Fire and subsequently became Archabbot of Saint Vincent Archabbey?
- Comment: QPQ coming
Created by Guerillero (talk). Self-nominated at 14:22, 7 January 2022 (UTC).
- Article: The article is new (created two days ago), properly sourced. Prose count checks. No issues with neutrality
- Hook:The length of the hook is in order. The information checks with the two sources provided in the article about him being a survivor, and later becoming Archabbot. The article was an interesting an enjoyable read, and the hook caught my eye to the point I decided to review it!
- Other:No issues with the image's license. QPQ still open.
- @Guerillero: Awaiting for QPQ to close this nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GDuwen (talk • contribs)
- The nomination is now complete! GDuwenHoller! 19:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P7 without image
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Leander Schnerr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Links
editProse
editLede
edit- Link for archabbot? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done it goes to Abbot --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- In 1892, Schnerr was elected as Archabbot. - I feel like this is obvious from what's been said before this. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Link for Archabbey? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Done it goes to Abbey which is a dreadful article --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
General
edit- Covington, Kentucky where - locations need a comma after. Check throughout. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- apostolic nuncio - the what? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- Linked. I will need to think of the WP:SEAOFBLUE fix. --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- That does need a fix, but I won't hold up promotion due to it. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Linked. I will need to think of the WP:SEAOFBLUE fix. --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Does Ernest Helmstetter meet WP:REDLINK? And even if so, can we say who he is? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
- He has enough obits that I think so. Explained. --Guerillero Parlez Moi 17:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Review meta comments
edit- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
- No copyvio found, spot checks came up fine. Nicely done. If you enjoyed the review, feel free to take a look at some of my nominations, otherwise, congratulations, I shall pass this article now.Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)