Talk:Lawrence A. Boland
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 142.58.152.232 in topic Untitled
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editBoland opposed to Friedman? I am bit surprised. Was not he wrote such papers as "A Critique of Friedman Critics"? My english is really horrible but I thought Boland was Friedmans best apologist. Jirka
Since when does the criticism of bad critiques constitute apology (i.e., defense). Perhaps you did not read my JEL paper to the end. Lawrence Boland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.58.152.232 (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)