Talk:Law Society of Scotland

Untitled

Details of an edit war on this site were published on Page 3 of today's Scotland on Sunday, which pointed out that one of the parties, 217.30.115.210 (talk · contribs), was from the Law Society itself. The critical material was not specifically sourced so I did not add it back, but I would still say that the edits by 217.30, which were made without any explanation or declaration of interest, were contrary to WP:COI.

I noticed a subsequent edit that deleted several links without explanation, so I attempted to revert this edit. The attempt was unsuccessful because one of these links was to a site which is (imo correctly) not accepted by Wikipedia. I then checked out the remaining links:

• Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers

Added this back. I don't think this is inappropriate, but if it is, then so is the linked page, which should be considered for deletion.

• The Scottish Legal Services Ombudsman

Completely harmless and wholly appropriate. Added it back.

• Injustice Scotland, a public campaign group

groups.msn.com is not accepted by Wikipedia, and I have no intention of challenging this policy.

• Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers, which aims to bring independent regulation to the legal profession in Scotland

Covered by above link. No need to duplicate.

• Scottish Consumer Council, Scotland's consumer protection body, which has conducted surveys into the workings of Scottish solicitors and the Law Society of Scotland

Low relevance; I was unable to find the surveys via this link. Not added back.

Viewfinder 14:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I repeat my position: as long as there is a Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers page on Wikipedia, is is approporaite and in order to link it to Law Society of Scotland. The persistent attempts to delete this link by the Law Society of Scotland contravene WP:COI and WP:OWN, and amount to censorship which I will continue to oppose, at least until the case for deleting the link is atated here, on this discussion page. Viewfinder (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

It would be interesting to know something more about the organization. I can't make out much from its website. There is question about its notability - how big is it? How significant? I'm not a Scots lawyer so I really don't know. Francis Davey (talk) 09:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. There is something interesting here. It would appear that all the edits to Law Society of Scotland by 82.41.10.217 (talk · contribs) were made outside noraml working hours, while those by 217.30.115.210 (talk · contribs) are being made within normal working hours. Could these two IPs be being operated by the same individual?? Viewfinder (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I decided that I had better not be provoked into reinstating this edit. 217.30.115.210 (talk · contribs) and (sockpuppet?) 82.41.10.217 (talk · contribs), declare your interest and make your case here. Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers make serious allegations. If they are correct then SACL should be linked. If they are not, nominate the SACL page for deletion or sue SACL for defamation. Viewfinder (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Is the "The" at the start of the title in accordance with Wikipedia standards? PatGallacher (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't think it is, see WP:THE. PatGallacher (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Law Society of Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110113191313/http://www.lawscot.org.uk:80/about-us/how-we-work to http://www.lawscot.org.uk/about-us/how-we-work

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Law Society of Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519040324/http://www.lawscot.org.uk/media/39493/an_introduction_to_our_services.pdf to http://www.lawscot.org.uk/media/39493/an_introduction_to_our_services.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728153944/http://www.advocates.org.uk/profession/index.html to http://www.advocates.org.uk/profession/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120305141205/http://www.thewssociety.co.uk/index.asp?tm=14 to http://www.thewssociety.co.uk/index.asp?tm=14

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law Society of Scotland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519040520/http://www.lawscot.org.uk/media/2112/LS_Annual_Report_2009(4).pdf to http://www.lawscot.org.uk/media/2112/LS_Annual_Report_2009(4).pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304133949/http://www.lawscot.org.uk/about-us/reports-and-meetings/constitution/ to http://www.lawscot.org.uk/about-us/reports-and-meetings/constitution/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)