Talk:Lavender Diamond

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reviews edit

I removed the three external links to reviews. There are dozens of reviews of the album across the internet, why highlight just these three? The last link was added by someone spamming wikipedia with his site. If people want to read reviews they can certainly google for them. Let me know if this is wrong. ikes 18:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reviews from notable sources can be spliced into the article as references, which this article needs. Morganfitzp (talk) 17:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lavender Diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply