This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Laurie Brereton is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I started a new article on Brereton's former assistant, Philip Dorling. If anyone knows of worthy content to add, please have a look! --Surturz (talk) 13:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I believe he'd fail WP:N as he was not elected to public office. Orderinchaos 15:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I'm not sure on WP:N. If it were just the one raid, I'd say sure, delete the entry. Two raids... I'm not sure. Other staffers such as Mark Textor have articles, so I don't think being elected is the sole criteria. Ideally, someone will come up with something additional to establish WP:N. The two raids and nothing else is borderline notability... the info revealed was no great watergate level revelation, I assume. --Surturz (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
