Talk:Lasius

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Chetvorno in topic Uploaded image misidentified

No Google Scholar results edit

It's odd that there are zero results from Google Scholar if one searches for Lasius flavoniger although there should be a recent (1992) publication and there is an entry in ITIS. There are also no results for schulzi and breviscapus. Icek (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Boreal? edit

What is the meaning of "boreal" in "boreal formicine ants"? The wikilink goes to a disambiguation page; I don't see an obvious candidate in the list of meanings given there.  --Lambiam 14:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Ants —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.30.140 (talk) 13:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Uploaded image misidentified edit

As I am new to editing on Wikipedia, I do not know how to flag a factually incorrect image. The "Moisture Ant-Lasius" image added by JJ Grieve is misidentified: the ant is actually Formica pacifica, a common ant in the Pacific Northwest. I will refrain from describing how the genera Formica and Lasius may be separated unless asked. I would very much like to see the image moved out of the Lasius page. Thank you. Aphaenogaster (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)AphaenogasterReply

I know nothing about entomology but from the little I was able to glean from a university extension data sheet] I had my doubts too. I'd say go ahead and remove the image. --ChetvornoTALK 00:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Removed it. --ChetvornoTALK 13:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply