Talk:Large deviations of Gaussian random functions

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Thanks, Deepmath. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

More needed edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Can something be added for cases which are not (2D) spheres? Finite regions in 1, 2 and 3D space for example. otherwise title is very misleading. Melcombe (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

It would be nice, but there is a problem: it would be much too technical, I'm afraid. If you'll look at my lectures (cited in Further reading) you'll see that even in a graduate course I did not find a possibility to consider "finite regions in 1, 2 and 3D space". Of course, they are the main source of pride for the authors. However, it seems to me that Wikipedia can only inform the reader that such a theory is available, and recommend references. On the other hand, if you (or anyone) will succeed in adding something like that to the article, I'll be glad. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was about to ask about this within a spherical domain vs. topological surface - seems like what you're discussing? ~E:74.60.29.141 (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Still, to this end you'd better read a source. --Boris Tsirelson (talk) 07:43, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic