This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The overall presentation of the article is not very well balanced, as the main content is just a negatively-toned "Controversy" section and there are no constructive sections detailing its scientific instrumentation and goals. The "Controversy" section was edited in recently (Jul 9 2014) by a single user, Serrano2014, who apparently has no other contribution to Wikipedia. Is this edit malicious? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meithan (talk • contribs) 04:09, 6 August 2014 (UTC)