| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Notability
editHi CRostvik - this cropped up in the NPP feed, I'm trying to find a route to notability - basically, without better sourcing I think this will end up at WP:AfD.
- WP:NPROF wouldn't fly as it stands, unless we can establish that her work has had a major impact on the discipline (criterion 1) - that has to be established by independent sourcing though. Do you know of any heavyweight reviews of her book, for example, that we could use to establish its impact? Or any of the other criteria you think might work?
- The alternative would be plain old WP:GNG, which is going to require independent, secondary sourcing giving her significant coverage. All of the sources are currently affiliated ones (her own website, an academic network she's involved with, and a commercial website selling her book) - are you aware of any better sourcing than this?
Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 16:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, thank you! This is useful, I am new to Wiki. So I am struggling with finding more sources. Would it be something like news coverage of this persons work? (CRostvik (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)).