![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editI don't see why not, they are the same topic, just different names. 64.178.96.166 05:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Jarrod
No. Definitely not. "Popularization of the term has diluted its technical meaning in some contexts to include any slip-of-the-tongue phenomenon, often in an attempt by the user to humorously assign hidden motives or sexual innuendo to the mistake."
This clearly explains that a Freudian Slip is not just a mistake in speaking or memory. Ibemonty2000 05:17, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Haplologies
editClicking the "Haplologies" link, it seems they are something quite different to what this page describes them as. 83.151.195.33 (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC) --I (anon) noticed this too; the definition of haplology is different on the haplology page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.128.205 (talk) 04:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Tornado?
edit"I'll explain this tornado later" - don't get that one. Peridon (talk) 13:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)