Talk:Laplace transform

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Constant314 in topic Probability Theory

article states often L is for managing imaginary edit

No. It was investigated as to if it impacts imaginary and how: but was and is not used with imaginary numbers particularly. I could say D or Dx are for managing imaginary numbers. But neither are they to any extent except in afterthought.

Readability edit

The occurrence of many Heaviside stepfunctions   in the table "selected Laplace transforms" is redundant and only makes sense if one considers the two-sided Laplace transform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hart15 (talkcontribs) 09:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please put new talk page messages at the bottom of talk pages and sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Integral Function is Potentially Confusing edit

The transform of the integral function is shown as:

 

While correct mathematically, why have the convolution on the right side? I don't think it adds much and potentially confuses new readers.

https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Laplace_Transform_of_Integral

Tables of Laplace transforms don't generally write it like this. Rhodydog (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Initial/final value theorems edit

Can someone explain what it means for a complex number to go to infinity? I could understand |s| -> inf or Re(s) -> but just s? 138.232.68.221 (talk) 08:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Probability Theory edit

It would be welcome to have   defined. Can someone please edit to provide a proper definition for those who are trying to read/understand/use as reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrKC MD (talkcontribs) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Done
Constant314 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply