Talk:Lantian Man/Archive 1

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lantian Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207235020/http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_artqa/2003-09/24/content_39044.htm to http://www.chinaculture.org/gb/en_artqa/2003-09/24/content_39044.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lantian Man/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Greetings. I have little experience at GAN so this may not be considered enough to pass it, but I will do my best.

Nitpicking

• "characteristic of the Acheulean industry which is usually" comma after Acheulean? It reads a little oddly without one.

done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• It was formally described by Chinese palaeoanthropologist Woo Ju-Kan" Maybe say "The fossil was...", as the immediately preceding sentence is about the location, not the fossil.

done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• "Chenchiawo yielded the dhole,..." Yielded is rather odd phrasing here.

features?

That works.

• "In 2018, Zhu and colleagues reported stone tools 2.1 million years ago at the Shangchen site" Surely they did not report stone tools 2.1 millions years ago... maybe change to 2.1 million years old?

done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

• "Lantian Man is a spectacle for the Shaanxi History Museum." This changes from past tense (in the previous part of the sentence) to present tense, which reads very strangely. Maybe change to "was a spectacle".

that would imply it's not there anymore   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Is there a way to say that it's still there without changing tenses, though? I.e. "it became a spectacle at the Shaanxi History Museum."

done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  02:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GA Critereon

• Verifiable - yes, and all the sources look suitable.
• Well-written - see nitpicks Yes.
• Coverage - yes, it covers the whole of the topic.
• NPOV - yes.
• Images - copyright looks fine.

• Support from me. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 03:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

See WP:GAN/I#PASS   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  12:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm not exactly an experienced reviewer, is it okay for me to just pass it? --SilverTiger12 (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I guess I just pass it, then. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)