Talk:Langley Park, Perth

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 49.195.201.191 in topic "only city..." claim

"Langley Park makes Perth the only city in the world where aircraft can land in the central business district." What, no other city in the entire world includes a space large enough to land a microlite, or a helicopter? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not exactly sure what this means. have been to Rio de Janiero, and I can attest there is an airport (Santos Dumont Airport) right by the central business district, although I don't know if it is *IN* the district itself. I mean, I was sitting in a skyscraper watching folks walk by on the tarmac. Its not a dirt landing strip either.


There is also an airport in the London (UK) CBD. It is called "London City Airport" and commuter flights come & go all day.


Just adding to my anonymous edit above, see http://www.londoncityairport.com/


Kansas City, MO has long had an airport extremely close: The Charles B. Wheeler Downtown Airport.

  • There are other similar airports. Reykjavik City Airport (not Keflavik) is basically next to, if not inside the center city of Reykjavik, though the city center is likely somewhat more diminutive than Perth's. Similarly, any number of cities have parks that are large enough to land a very small plane in, even if it would be thoroughly unadvisable to do so and would probably cause a significant amount of alarm. --DMG413 00:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


San Diego International Airport is within sight of the city's business district.


Santos Dumont Airport is right in downtown Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It is more than a landing field. It is a fully operational airport, operating round-the-clock flights to São Paulo and Belo Horizonte. Furthermore, it has a small Air Force Station.

"only city..." claim

edit

The claim is supported by a reference, but it seems to by rather more tourism hype than fact. Please hold discussions in this talk page not in the article itself! Are the Perth people able to refine the uniqueness claim by making the scope narrower? --Scott Davis Talk 01:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I watered down the statement (as I tried to yesterday but was reverted). Of the other places I've looked at (via google images) Langley is still the closest to a CBD (my POV of course). Stuff I removed:
(Meigs Field in Chicago, USA could have potentially qualified for this definition; however, that facility was recently removed from service). Toronto, Canada's Toronto City Centre Airport has daily Dash-8 commuter flights from an island a short ferry ride from the business district, and several cities have seaplane services to the CBD. (Edmonton, Alberta Canada's Edmonton City Centre Airport is also located within the heart of the city.http://www.edmontonairports.com).
--Commander Keane 09:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
What a nonsense advertorial claim ! 3000 feet of grassed flat ground hardly constitutes a real airport runway. Its use for an emergency landing, subject to collateral risks to pedestrians and passing cars, is acknowledged in the article. However, the claim must still be true, as the "fact" was cited in the ABC TV quiz program "Think Tank", with compere Paul MacDermott on Monday, 27 August 2018.
Of course, practically speaking, operationally Kai Tak Airport was located in the CBD of Hong Kong from 1925 until 1998. Indeed, it was officially known as Hong Kong International Airport from 1954 until its 1998 closure.49.195.201.191 (talk) 09:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

How many aircraft commemorated 100 years of powered flight

edit
  Resolved

The article says:

In 2003, to celebrate 100 years of powered flight, 10 aircraft representing each decade of the 20th century landed.

As written, this implies a total of 100 aircraft, ie 10 for each decade. I suspect that it was only 10 in total, 1 for each decade. Alas, the refs don't tell me. Does someone know how many there were? If it was only 10, we need to insert a comma after "aircraft" or (better) say "10 aircraft, one representing each decade...". Mitch Ames (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Langley Park (Western Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Langley Park (Western Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply