Talk:Langham Hotel, London
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis is mostly historical information and barely contains any information about the hotel as it is today, and seeing that it was built in 1865, I feel like it's survived long enough to warrant a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LHinternational (talk • contribs)
- Please also indicate, then, why it's notable citing reliable sources. Thanks. → AA (talk • contribs) — 10:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Um, why are you requesting speedy deletion when this article has existed since March 15, 2005? If you thought the edits by User:Lhinternational [1] were too commercial why didn't you just remove the excessive links that he added (which I just did)? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- The deletion tag is not completed correctly, please check and try again. This building has a long history, including much of its time spent in the ownership of the BBC. I would be enclined to keep it. Kbthompson 17:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- It was one of a series of articles on Langham Hotels where the only source used was the hotel's own website and there appeared to be a COI concerning the main contributor, User:LHinternational (who incidentally no longer exists). It read like an advertisement, although admittedly, this article has more historical info than the other ones. It seems evident that the AfD will result in a keep so it would be useful to add a few secondary sources if anyone can find them since the article is still lacking in this area. → AA (talk • contribs) — 19:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- The deletion tag is not completed correctly, please check and try again. This building has a long history, including much of its time spent in the ownership of the BBC. I would be enclined to keep it. Kbthompson 17:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Um, why are you requesting speedy deletion when this article has existed since March 15, 2005? If you thought the edits by User:Lhinternational [1] were too commercial why didn't you just remove the excessive links that he added (which I just did)? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Langham Hotel, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723090915/http://www.langhamhotels.com/pdf/lhi_history_lhi_en.pdf to http://www.langhamhotels.com/pdf/lhi_history_lhi_en.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)