Talk:Langdon, Kent
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 45ossington in topic Merger suggestion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2017. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Portsmouth/Applied Human Geography (Spring 2017)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Merger suggestion
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to reject merger. 45ossington (talk) 16:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC))
There is an article on East Langdon, which (according to this article) is the same place. This article is better developed but, if it is more usually called East Langdon, perhaps the conjoined article should have "East Langdon" in the title? 45ossington (talk) 09:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- I understand the sentiment here, but do we do the same merge for West Langdon, Martin and Martin Mill. I have altered this article to make it plain that Langdon is the civil parish.... can be checked here: https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/. Acabashi (talk) 12:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- As stated also at Talk:East Langdon, it has been demonstrated to me that my suggestion of a merger is ill-conceived. Unless anyone disagrees, I withdraw it, with apology for any time wasted. The article now looks in much better shape after Acabashi's improvements. 45ossington (talk) 17:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.