Talk:Landsat 1/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 20:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 20:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

• Ref 9 is dead.

  • Y Found an archived version.

• Use consistent dates for citations.

  • Y Done (found a couple in the infobox too)

• Third paragraph needs referencing.

  • Y Finally found the citation for this, not sure why I couldn't find it quicker. Kees08 (Talk)

• Ref 8 seems like a WP:SPS. Are there any better sources?
  • In the spaceflight industry, Astronautix is considered a WP:RS, and falls under this: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. from WP:SPS. A quick Google search shows several books that cite the website. We used it pretty extensively in our spacecraft design classes too, for what its worth :).

That should be it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 21:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Done! Let me know if there is anything else you want me to change. Kees08 (Talk) 05:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)