Talk:Land of the Lustrous (TV series)/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Alexandra IDV in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 00:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


Will be doing this, may take up to a week due to real-life matters. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The premise/synopsis section seems too short. I'm aware there's a plot section in the main series article, but perhaps at least an overview of the series' events could be added here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
    @Narutolovehinata5: Per MOS:TVPLOT, an article should not both contain a prose summary of the plot and a table of episode summaries. Basically, if the episode list were to be spun out into its own article (which might happen if the show gets renewed for a second season), then yes, the plot section should be expanded, but as it is right now it should not.--Alexandra IDVtalk 06:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Noted. Though if the series' episode list is split off, please make sure to write a more detailed synopsis. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes, of course.--Alexandra IDVtalk 06:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Really appreciate the discussion of Japanese reception here, particularly on the awards it won. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    See above. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Once the issue with the premise section is resolved, this will be a pass. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
There are no more outstanding issues, so this is now a pass. Good work as always. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:20, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!--Alexandra IDVtalk 06:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply