Talk:Lake Te Wapu/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:53, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Will review this in a few days^ Arconning (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Generalissima Here ya go! Hope some of my short comments shall be addressed. :) Arconning (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Arconning: Okiedokie! Think thats it. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

• No issues, though a question; just wondering that if the "Average depth" parameter in the infobox and maximum depth mentioned in the body, shouldn't they be different as "average" connotes the average depths of different parts of the lake itself?
  • Oh, good point; fixed infobox. - G

Description

• No issues, just see previous question.

Flora and fauna

• Optional: "However, areas of the lake not fenced-off to cattle lack tall emergent plants due to grazing.", wikilink grazing.

Media

• Images have proper licensing and are relevant to the article.

Refs

• Earwig shows nothing.
  • Following is a source review as there are a few.
    • I'm kinda dodgy on the Lakes380 Project but I'll be passing it conditionally.
    • Meredith & Croucher 2007 is all good, statements are correct.
    • King & Morrison 1990, same as well.
    • Baling et al. 2023, can't confirm the information as I don't have direct access so AGF, though it seems good.
    • Champion & Clayton 2004, same with the previous comment.
    • Grimwood et al. 2023, good!

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad and focused information, neutral. :)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.