Talk:Lake Cowal

	Lakes portal Lake Cowal is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lake Cowal is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merger from Lake Cowal Campaign edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

I propose that the Lake Cowal Campaign article be merged with the Lake Cowal article - showing as a separate section in the latter article--A Y Arktos 23:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

agree - campaign page is small now and would benefit from being attached to main page.--naught101 23:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Now merged--A Y Arktos 00:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is the mine still using the cyanide process? If not then this whole article is completely dated and needs revision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.120.206 (talk) 09:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Lake Cowal Campaign and Barrick Gold reads as if it's been written by a protester. It's totally one sided and is without sources. Bidgee (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Cowal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100920072245/http://barrick.com/GlobalOperations/AustraliaPacific/Cowal/default.aspx to http://www.barrick.com/GlobalOperations/AustraliaPacific/Cowal/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic