Talk:Lake Atna

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Femkemilene in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lake Atna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Editoneer (talk · contribs) 08:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Editoneer (talk) 08:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Eek, I need to go for now, here's my decision so far. Editoneer (talk) 09:23, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well-written, Broadness, Neutrality

edit
  • (ka, I feel that ( is misplaced.   Done
  • dispersed, sadly links to a disambiguation page.   Done
  • There's many words that show doubt, it's not confirmable?   Done
  • In 1901 (...) In 1957,, I believe [In year] is becoming too repeatable, do you believe that you are able to write and then in 1957 or somewhere along those lines?   Done
  • (river) outlet as the river didn't have any way to flow?   Done
    • I'm not sure this is an improvement, During its early formation, the lake likely had no permanent outlet., so I suppose you could say "water outlet", or "river outlet", but I think that's pretty implied from the lake not having an outlet. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:49, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Verifiability

edit

Media

edit

Good job and good luck! Editoneer (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Second opinion

edit

Good review, good article. I've got but a few things to nitpick over:

  • Later: Matanuska River, Susitna River, Tok River, and Copper River depending on period isn't completely sourced in the body. (from infobox)
  • Smith is listed in sources, and also in references (FN14), but less well formatted (not relevant to GA criteria)
  • One flood may have contributed to the destruction caused by the 1964 Alaska earthquake. I had initially read the lead too fast, and assumed the lake flooded in 1964. I think this sentence would benefit from explaining quickly by what mechanism (Old deposits from a flood may have contributed ...(?) (and then caused by -> from to make the sentence shorter?). FemkeMilene (talk) 18:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh wow, it's done already? Editoneer (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I thought your initial review was great. Nice and in-depth. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Femkemilene:, hello, if you are done with your second opinion please tell me. Editoneer (talk) 03:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I'm done. FemkeMilene (talk) 07:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply