Talk:Lajonkairia lajonkairii

Roditapes philipinarum

Voice 120.28.236.231 (talk) 06:09, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 4 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus; a split should be considered instead. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 11:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

---

Lajonkairia lajonkairii → Ruditapes philippinarum – These aren't actually synonyms, and almost all the info in the page refers to Ruditapes (the Manila clam). It looks like the page used to be Venerupis philippinarum, which is a synonym of Ruditapes, not Lajonkairia. Seems like it was probably an honest mistake. . Zilchlucre (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Zilchlucre (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Japan has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Bivalves has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

• Question: Worms considers these different species. Would a split not be better? YorkshireExpat (talk) 13:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

  A split would be very reasonable. Currently all the info in the article appears to be about Ruditapes (but correct me if I'm wrong), so an article on Lajonkairia would probably have to be written from new sources. Zilchlucre (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 4 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. A split may be in the cards. – robertsky (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

---

Lajonkairia lajonkairii → Ruditapes philippinarum – These aren't actually synonyms, and almost all the info in the page refers to Ruditapes (the Manila clam). Zilchlucre (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). ThomasEverest (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Please go through with undoing this. It is very confusing. The title is Lajonkairia lajonkairii but all the info is Ruditapes philippinarum.

• Oppose. As noted last time, if R. philippinarum is a separate species, then split it out. The solution is not to move this page though, which deals at least as much with L. lajonkairii and is sourced as such.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

OK please do that then. Every time I try to edit something, my work is undone with very rude comments about my knowledge and abilities. ThomasEverest (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.