Talk:Laika: Aged Through Blood/GA1

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Vacant0 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PresN (talk · contribs) 03:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 23:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 23:45, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Initial comments

edit
  •   There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 17.4% in similarity.
  •   There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  •   The article is stable.
  •   No previous GA reviews.

General comments

edit
  •   Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
    • "...and PlayStation 4,..." → "and for PlayStation 4,"
    • Remove the last comma in the lede.
    • "...is an 2D side-scrolling..." – replace "an" with "a"
    • "Enemies respawn whenever Laika dies, or if she leaves and re-enters an area" – remove the comma
    • "These weapons have a very limited amount of ammo, but can be reloaded indefinitely by performing a full backwards rotation of the motorcycle." – remove the comma
    • "The weapons are gathered throughout the course of the game, and can be upgraded in the village with resources to have more ammo or reload with less rotation." – remove the comma
    • "...retrieving the bags causes them to disappear" – replace "causes" with "cause"
    • "Eventually the rampant consumption..." → "Eventually, the rampant consumption"
    • "...non-birds hide from the patrolling Bird solidiers" – replace "hide" with "hid"
    • "...passing the abilities to them in turn" → "passing the abilities on to them in turn"
    • "...runs away from home to search herself" → "runs away from home to search for herself"
    • "...a nuclear weapon which will eradicate..." → "a nuclear weapon that will eradicate"
    • "...and along with the motorcycle were intended..." → "and along with the motorcycle, they were intended"
    • "...artstyle..." → "art style"
    • "...had frustrations with some mechanics" – remove had
    • "...that succeeded at connecting to players emotionally" → "that succeeded in connecting with players emotionally"
    • "...and the way that visual and level design..." → "and the way that the visual and level design"
  •   Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  •   Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
    • No referencing issues.
    • Reliability:
      • It would be good to find a replacement for the Spotify reference.
      • I've checked other references, they're reliable.
    • Please use full release dates in the text.
    • Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  •   Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
  •   Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The aritcle meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  •   Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
  •   Checking images.
    • Images are properly licensed.

Final comments

edit

@PresN: I'll promote the article once these issues get addressed. The review will be on hold for a week. Good job on the article. --Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 13:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Vacant0: All prose comments done, and full release dates used in the text. I would like to replace the Spotify reference, but unfortunately cannot find any RSs for the info that aren't other storefronts. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for being so fast. I'll promote the article now. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 14:21, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.