Literal meaning edit

Article needs literal meaning of province name, and Han Tu. Badagnani 07:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The name in Han Tu is not necessary. Vietnamese government and people don't use it. An Apple of Newton talk 15:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, it's not necessary for modern use but very useful for etymological and historical purposes, in order to have a contextual understanding of Vietnamese history (these characters were used to write Vietnamese historical documents for thousands of years). Without it, one is cut off from one's own written history and the meanings behind one's own toponyms. Badagnani 02:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Both the Nom Foundation and Chinese Wikipedia give . But the translation doesn't seem to make sense. What is the etymology of this toponym? Badagnani 02:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

People's Council Chair listing edit

Needs People's Council Chair listing to remove cleanup tag.

Needs map edit

Article needs a map! Badagnani 17:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Province map added; need close-up map now. Badagnani 08:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have a better image, but I'm unsucsessfully trying to upload. Can I post a link to my Flicr and then someone else could add, if desired. 92.235.199.62 (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Undiscussed move counter RM edit

(cur | prev) 10:23, 28 September 2011‎ Kauffner (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (8,242 bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved Lai Châu Province to Lai Chau province: Lower case, non-diacritical form to correspond with names of other provinces, per AP, VNA. Discussed at WP:VIET.) (undo) ...not discussed at WP:VIET and contrary to geo RM 7 Aug 2011 Talk:Cần Thơ reconfirmed Talk:Cà Mau. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lai Chau Province is now deleted, so Lai Chau province can be moved there. So at least the capitalization is fixed. This should be done ASAP, as there are several incoming links pointing to Lai Chau Province. Diacritics should be resolved centrally for all provinces. NVanMinh (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
How can a move be "counter" to an RM for an unrelated article that had a "no consensus" result? Kauffner (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
If a RM to remove Vietnamese names for 14 towns doesn't get consensus then undiscussed moves to remove Vietnamese names from those articles and 800x other geo articles is "counter" that RM. Also there was no discussion at WP:VIET. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:25, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bac Ninh Province which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:44, 5 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lai Châu Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:21, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply