Talk:Laffit Pincay Jr.

suggest a reworking of the "Sham" section

The extensive section on Sham's Triple Crown journey appears out of proportion to the rest of the article. Recommend it be moved to a later part of the article and be shortened to perhaps a sentence or two, ideally along with examples other major horses and races that made Pincay's career significant. If there is a desire to include this level of detail, it probably belongs in the article on Sham himself, rather than the article on Pincay. Additionally, if kept, it should probably be reworded to avoid editorial content such as wording like "superhorse", or "tired after a good effort". Cigar95 (talk) 03:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Winningest in sports articles under discussion

Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

BLP point

The phrasing: "…was once flat racing's winningest all-time jockey, still holding second place many years after his retirement." is unsourced wirhin the article, and I intend to remove it forthwith under WP:BLP#Reliable_sources, which states, "…contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable, and whether it is in a biography or in some other article." --Pete (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Laffit Pincay Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090323010701/http://madelyncain.com/ to http://www.madelyncain.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008224627/http://www.racingmuseum.org/hall/jockey.asp?ID=213 to http://www.racingmuseum.org/hall/jockey.asp?ID=213
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116095649/http://ntra.com/content.aspx?type=news&id=11729 to http://www.ntra.com/content.aspx?type=news&id=11729

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)