Talk:Ladybower Reservoir

Comments

The facts in the side panel do not seem to be correct. A volume of 1.14 x 10^-5 km³ equates to only 11,400 m³ which is a tiny volume of water. Simple maths shows this to be wrong. If the water is 15m deep then this volume of water would only occupy an area of 800 m² or 40m x 20m !!

A more authoritive source from when the dam was refurbished

[1] Severn Trent Water - The Ladybower Reservoir Dam Refurbishment Scheme

gives the following figures which seem much more plausible:

Surface area 210 hectares

Max volume of reservoir: 27,800,000 m³

Since an hectare is 10,000 m², that would correspond to an average water depth of around 15m which seems reasonable with probably a maximum depth of around 30m.

Reesharr

Length

There two different figures given for the maximum length. In the main text it says 4.8 km in the Infobox it says 4 km. This needs correction as it affects surface area, storage capacity. --Drgkl (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladybower Reservoir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051109014431/http://simscience.org/cracks/dambusters.html to http://simscience.org/cracks/dambusters.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)