Talk:La Gusana Ciega

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on La Gusana Ciega. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107045500/http://www.superbeelgc.com/ to http://www.superbeelgc.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008064557/http://www.cosmonova.com.mx/ to http://www.cosmonova.com.mx/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107140516/http://www.pardovandaik.com/ to http://www.pardovandaik.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Regarding my edits on 2019-12-10

I am not sure if the things I typed are factually accurate, but they are more faithful translations of the Spanish version of this Wikipedia article. Just one example from the first sentence: The Spanish says "un grupo formado por (nombre, nombre), y (nombre)". The English version said "a group formed by (name, name), and name". This is a direct calque, and "to form" is cognate with "formar", but in English it strongly suggests that those three people are the founding members, the original members. I changed it to "composed of" or similar.

The spelling was mostly US-style, but there was one instance of Oxford spelling. I "fixed it", in scare quotes because the Oxford Dictionary and Merriam-Webster are both valid dictionaries. Wikipedia generally recommends consistency above all else, but choosing between British and American spelling based on the topic of the article. This was only one word and only one land border from US, so let's do US spelling the whole time.

That said, I added Oxford commas. That's a joke, I call them serial commas and they are in many American style guides. Once again, my goal was consistency. Some other commas were also missing, in my opinion. Including the pair of commas around an album name, example, which is not really an opinion. I forgot the album name, wrapping it in commas was necessary and I don't know why.

I replaced "LP" with "full-length album" once and "studio album" once. LP is correct, but the first instance came right after discussing CDs, DVDs, and digital downloads, which makes me think "LP means vinyl", which I doubt is the case. Whether or not it was released on vinyl, I can see it refers to a full-length album. So that sentence is now definitely true, even if it was true before.

I added last names after first names in many cases, but the best thing in Wikipedia style is to use just last names (apellidos) if it is not the first mention. I didn't remove the first names for multiple reasons, one being that I don't want the Page History so show names being "swapped", they are being made more specific. Fluoborate (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)