Talk:LGBT rights in Tasmania
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LGBT rights in Tasmania article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit"Partnerships that are registered in Tasmania are not automatically recognised in most parts of Australia when travelling or moving interstate."
I am not sure about this, and have removed it. I think it can be added back once we are sure that this is the case. Some states have regulations that recognise registered relationships from other states, and the majority of jurisdictions now have registered partnerships or civil unions.
Is this outdated? In fact, there seems to be a contradictory statement saying that NSW, QLD, ACT and VIC recognise such relationships since 2012. SA, WA and NT are not 'most of Australia' by population size or by the number of jurisdictions.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921055047/http://www.premier.tas.gov.au/media_room/media_releases/parliament_passes_landmark_surrogacy_laws to http://www.premier.tas.gov.au/media_room/media_releases/parliament_passes_landmark_surrogacy_laws
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights in Tasmania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011122115/http://www.sstar.net.au/news/2010/10/07/tasmania-moves-on-marriage/14797 to http://www.sstar.net.au/news/2010/10/07/tasmania-moves-on-marriage/14797
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141116073243/http://www.samesame.com.au/news/11595/Same-sex-marriages-are-now-protected-in-NSW-law to http://www.samesame.com.au/news/11595/Same-sex-marriages-are-now-protected-in-NSW-law
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 14 December 2017 (UTC)