Talk:LGBT history in the United States

Latest comment: 1 year ago by PurpleReindeer in topic Replaced pre-Obama material

Issues with relevance edit

A lot of the information in this article, especially the 18th-19th century is potentially beyond the scope of US LGBT history, and could have its own separate page. I think it takes away from the main points. Also the language used in the first sections is not concise enough. I think the focus needs to be brought back to Historical Events (social movements, education, laws, public health), and Figures. C.canovi (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Actually would it be better if the page was reorganized into different sections – "(social movements, education, laws, public health), and Figures" ?
or maybe instead organized into a list of historical events and each listed historical event (it can be person place thing whatever) is in chronological order? C.canovi (talk) 17:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I also think the timeline organization could be better but im not sure how C.canovi (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Muzizimu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 9 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HaleyHam.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Replaced pre-Obama material edit

I've replaced the pre-Obama history that was removed by AHC300 in December 2016, though I understand why they removed it as much of it was unsourced and essay-like. However, if the article is going to be called LGBT History in the United States it should have more than just the Obama and Trump administrations. Have deleted some of the more essay -like language and will work on referencing, since there does seem to be stuff worth keeping. Help on finding sources for the material is much appreciated. Otherwise, perhaps an entirely new article could be created on LGBT policies of Obama and/or Trump. ABF99 (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your work ABF99! I share your skepticism of the choice made in 2016 to organize recent history by presidential administration. LGBT history is more than a list of things that the president has done. I agree that breaking some of that information out into one or more new articles would be a solution. I am planning to revise soon unless there are more thoughts. Jno.skinner (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@ABF99 I think (if it hasn't been done yet), breaking it into different pages may be useful for providing greater detail into specific actions caused during specific times/actors. One page could focus on specific government actions (ie state of Illinois, etc), political leaders (arranged by president). PurpleReindeer (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT history in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT history in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT history in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why include words in Webster's dictionary? edit

I don't see the point of mentioning that pederast, buggery, sodomy, were included in Webster's dictionary. This says nothing about LGBT people at the time. These terms had surely been used for centuries and the fact that they were mentioned in the dictionary doesn't seem relevant.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 03:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Naddruf. If the point of mentioning the dictionary is to say idea of non-heterosexual behavior was conceptually available to Americans of the 19th century, this could be stated much more concisely. I'm planning to revise unless there is more input.Jno.skinner (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I agree I dont see the relevance and think most of it should be cut out C.canovi (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply